Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

US poised to ease restrictions on marijuana

WASHINGTON — The U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration will move to reclassify marijuana as a less dangerous drug, The Associated Press has learned, a historic shift to generations of American drug policy that could have wide ripple effects across the country. The proposal, which still must be reviewed by the White House Office of Management and Budget, would recognize the medical uses of cannabis and acknowledge it has less potential for abuse than some of the nation's most dangerous drugs. However, it would not legalize marijuana outright for recreational use. The agency's move, confirmed to the AP on Tuesday by five people familiar with the matter who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss the sensitive regulatory review, clears the last significant regulatory hurdle before the agency's biggest policy change in more than 50 years can take effect. Once OMB signs off, the DEA will take public comment on the plan to move marijuana from its current classification as a Schedule I drug, alongside heroin and LSD. It moves pot to Schedule III, alongside ketamine and some anabolic steroids, following a recommendation from the federal Health and Human Services Department. After the public comment period and a review by an administrative judge, the agency would eventually publish the final rule. "Today, the Attorney General circulated a proposal to reclassify marijuana from Schedule I to Schedule III," Justice Department director of public affairs Xochitl Hinojosa said in a statement. The DEA is a component of the Department of Justice. "Once published by the Federal Register, it will initiate a formal rulemaking process as prescribed by Congress in the Controlled Substances Act." Attorney General Merrick Garland's signature throws the full weight of the Justice Department behind the move and appears to signal its importance to the Biden administration. It comes after President Joe Biden called for a review of federal marijuana law in October 2022 and moved to pardon thousands of Americans convicted federally of simple possession of the drug. He has also called on governors and local leaders to take similar steps to erase marijuana convictions. "Criminal records for marijuana use and possession have imposed needless barriers to employment, housing, and educational opportunities," Biden said in December. "Too many lives have been upended because of our failed approach to marijuana. It's time that we right these wrongs." The election year announcement could help Biden, a Democrat, boost flagging support, particularly among younger voters. Biden and a growing number of lawmakers from both major political parties have been pushing for the DEA decision as marijuana has become increasingly decriminalized and accepted, particularly by younger people. A Gallup poll last fall found 70% of adults support legalization, the highest level yet recorded by the polling firm and more than double the roughly 30% who backed it in 2000. The DEA didn't respond to repeated requests for comment. Schedule III drugs are still controlled substances and subject to rules and regulations, and people who traffic in them without permission could still face federal criminal prosecution. Some critics argue the DEA shouldn't change course on marijuana, saying rescheduling isn't necessary and could lead to harmful side effects. Jack Riley, a former deputy administrator of the DEA, said he had concerns about the proposed change because he thinks marijuana remains a possible "gateway drug," one that may lead to the use of other drugs. "But in terms of us getting clear to use our resources to combat other major drugs, that's a positive," Riley said, noting that fentanyl alone accounts for more than 100,000 deaths in the U.S. a year. On the other end of the spectrum, others argue marijuana should be treated the way alcohol is. "While this rescheduling announcement is a historic step forward, I remain strongly committed to continuing to work on legislation like the SAFER Banking Act as well as the Cannabis Administration and Opportunity Act, which federally deschedules cannabis by removing it from the Controlled Substances Act," Senate Majority Leader Sen. Chuck Schumer of New York said in a statement. "Congress must do everything we can to end the federal prohibition on cannabis and address longstanding harms caused by the War on Drugs." Federal drug policy has lagged behind many states in recent years, with 38 having already legalized medical marijuana and 24 legalizing its recreational use. That's helped fuel fast growth in the marijuana industry, with an estimated worth of nearly $30 billion. Easing federal regulations could reduce the tax burden that can be 70% or more for businesses, according to industry groups. It could also make it easier to research marijuana, since it's very difficult to conduct authorized clinical studies on Schedule I substances. The immediate effect of rescheduling on the nation's criminal justice system would likely be more muted, since federal prosecutions for simple possession have been fairly rare in recent years. But loosening restrictions could carry a host of unintended consequences in the drug war and beyond. Critics point out that as a Schedule III drug, marijuana would remain regulated by the DEA. That means the roughly 15,000 cannabis dispensaries in the U.S. would have to register with the DEA like regular pharmacies and fulfill strict reporting requirements, something that they are loath to do and that the DEA is ill equipped to handle. Then there's the United States' international treaty obligations, chief among them the 1961 Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, which requires the criminalization of cannabis. In 2016, during the Obama administration, the DEA cited the U.S.' international obligations and the findings of a federal court of appeals in Washington in denying a similar request to reschedule marijuana.        

$4.55 million settlement: Funds support construction worker hurt in on-job accident

Action: Workers’ compensation Injuries alleged: C6-C7 fracture and dislocation resulting in incomplete quadriplegia Case name: Withheld Court: N.C. Industrial Commission Mediator: Gillie Spratt, Charlotte Amount: $4.55 million Date: Jan. 29, 2024 Most helpful expert: Cynthia Wilhelm, Ph.D. Attorneys: Rick Anderson of Sumwalt Anderson, Charlotte (for the plaintiff) Plaintiff, 39, a roofer, was rendered an incomplete quadriplegic after a fall from a rooftop. The carrier accepted plaintiff's claim and paid all medical bills from the date of injury through settlement. The carrier also initiated indemnity compensation immediately following plaintiff's injury at a compensation rate of $400 per week. Plaintiff’s counsel disputed the calculation of plaintiff's average weekly wage and compensation rate. After extensive discovery, the parties entered into a consent order agreeing to an average weekly wage of $1,000 per week and a compensation rate of $666.67 per week. Plaintiff worked tirelessly during his yearlong rehabilitation process to regain strength and function in his upper extremities. At the time of settlement, plaintiff was able to operate his wheelchair, feed himself, place his catheter and perform most of his activities of daily living with minimal to moderate supervision and assistance. The $4.55 million settlement was composed of a $1.34 million lump sum cash payment at the time of settlement plus the purchase of annuities costing $3.21 million. If plaintiff lives a full life expectancy, the annuities will provide $10.05 million in payments. When he was injured, plaintiff lived in an apartment with his wife and two young children. Plaintiff and his wife are using the cash portion of the settlement to build a handicapped-accessible home and purchase a new handicapped-accessible van. The remainder of the settlement proceeds were used to purchase annuities that will provide plaintiff with payments of more than $160,000 per year for the remainder of his life.

$1.5 million settlement: Child dies in crash after lumber truck overturns, spills cargo

Action: Motor vehicle collision leading to wrongful death Injuries alleged: Fatally crushed Case name: Wanda Bailey, Administratrix of the Estate of Noah L Hill v. Jeffrey D. McManus, Stone Wheel Trucking LLC et al Court/case no.: Surry County Superior Court / 23 CVS 382 Amount: $1.5 million High-low agreement: Yes Date: March 18, 2024 Attorneys: H. Brent Helms and Bryan C. Thompson of Robinson & Lawing, Winston-Salem (for the plaintiff); Todd King of Cranfill Sumner, Charlotte; Jeremy Kosin of Teague Rotenstreich, Greensboro; and Christopher Skinner of McAngus, Goudelock & Courie, Raleigh (for the defendant) Insurance companies: Gemini Insurance Co. and Progressive Southeastern Insurance Co. Stone Wheel Trucking was the owner of a 1999 Peterbilt tractor-trailer truck, and Church & Church Lumber was the owner of a 1998 “bolster” trailer. Stone Wheel, Church & Church, and another defendant allegedly operated a joint venture/enterprise. Stone Wheel did not have a trailer that was capable or suitable for transporting lumber in interstate commerce. Church & Church agreed to loan or supply Stone Wheel a trailer and securement devices compliant with the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations. Jeffrey D. McManus was assigned by Stone Wheel to transport the lumber as driver of the truck and bolster trailer. Church & Church’s employees loaded the lumber onto the trailer, but the lumber was not secured with devices that were not appropriate or were defective, worn down, damaged or a combination of these. The tractor-trailer was driven Aug. 10, 2022, on N.C. 67-U.S. 601 instead of the most direct route to its destination, Interstate 77. N.C. 67-U.S. 601 is a curvy two-lane road with a posted speed limit of 55 mph. A warning sign notifies drivers of dangerous curves and recommends a speed of 35 mph to navigate them safely. The logging truck was being driven at about 65 mph. An oncoming 2018 Nissan was being properly driven with the decedent, Noah L. Hill, 4, strapped into a child-restraint seat. McManus lost control of the tractor-trailer on a dangerous curve, causing it to overturn and cross the center line. As a result of the overturning and the improper maintenance of the trailer and the securement devices, the lumber broke free from the tie-downs and spilled into the oncoming lane of travel. It violently crashed into the oncoming Nissan, causing massive, traumatic injuries to the decedent, which led to his pain, suffering and ultimate death.